Pre-seed / seed · Components, not end-products · Ukraine & allies

We have been here the whole time

Capital is rushing toward Ukrainian dual-use technology from the outside. We built, invested and lived through the cycle that produced it, long before the money arrived.

19 yrsInvesting since 2007
1stInvestor in Sine Engineering, well before the others
$10–15MTarget fund size

We are not claiming an empty field

The position

Funds of every size are active in Ukrainian dual-use now, most of them arriving once the category had a name. The gap is not who got here first, but who understands what they are looking at. It is a call we were making before the category existed.

What we back

Focus & structure
Stage

Pre-seed and seed, with selective early Series A follow-on via reserves. That is the round the past four years’ companies reach as angel checks stop carrying them.

Geography

Ukraine-first, with roughly three-quarters of capital. The remainder is open to allied markets, whose defense budgets are now opening to suppliers based outside their own borders.

Sectors

Underlying technology — components, sensing, compute, software — dual-use by nature: built for defense-grade conditions, transferable to adjacent commercial markets.

Check size

$250K initial; up to $500K for later-stage opportunities within the portfolio, plus reserves for follow-on.

Excludes

Weapons and munitions, drones and other finished defense end-products, and anything without a credible path to customers beyond the Ukrainian market — whether through civilian dual-use applications or export to allied defense markets.

Target size$10–15M
Target deals15–20 companies
Reserve ratio~40% of fund
Investment period2–3 years (target)
VehicleAngelList fund

Portfolio

Three companies · September 2026

Sine Engineering

Drone communications and navigation infrastructure, battle-tested. Now in a Series A process with large investors in active diligence.

DoD Solution

Operating as AURA. Vertically integrated autonomy stack — sensing, compute, software — for unmanned aerial, ground, and maritime systems.

PAI Defence

Passive RF sensing and signal intelligence for detecting and locating radio-emitting objects, with commercial applications beyond defense.

The name

Wild Field — the historical Ukrainian frontier: contested, ungoverned territory where survival depended on adaptability, not institutional backing. That is the environment our portfolio companies build in today.

People

Partners & advisors
Leon Podobedov, Lead GP at Wild Field

Leon Podobedov

Lead GP

Fund management, investment decisions, LP relations. GP at hi5 Ventures; angel investor since 2007.

LinkedIn
Eugene Sobakarov, anchor LP of Wild Field

Eugene Sobakarov

Anchor LP

Deal flow, co-decision, co-investment. Co-founder of Jooble; largest individual LP commitment.

LinkedIn
Maksym Zubenko, venture partner at Wild Field

Maksym Zubenko

Venture partner

Growth and go-to-market. Ex-Jooble, ex-Reply.io.

LinkedIn
Alex Borshch, advisor to Wild Field

Alex Borshch

Advisor

Defence-tech advisory, technical due diligence. Founder of Dark River; serial founder, RF/SDR tinkerer.

LinkedIn
Oleg Salamaha, advisor to Wild Field

Oleg Salamaha

Advisor

AI strategy, defence-tech advisory. Chief AI Officer at Dark River; founder of Serpstat.

LinkedIn
Andriy Chulyk, advisor to Wild Field

Andriy Chulyk

Advisor

Co-founder and CEO of Sine Engineering. 20+ years in telecom, hardware and IoT; ex-co-founder of Movably.

LinkedIn
Andriy Zvirko, advisor to Wild Field

Andriy Zvirko

Advisor

Chief Strategy Officer at Sine Engineering. Built and brought to market ecosystems scaled to millions of users (Fixly.pl, OLX.ua).

LinkedIn
Yurii Stasinchuk, advisor to Wild Field

Yurii Stasinchuk

Advisor

Co-founder and CEO of FoxFour. DARPA competition winner; publications at ICRA and in Robotics and Autonomous Systems.

LinkedIn

What we bring

Beyond the check

Everything below runs through the same technical bench: engineers and operators who assess dual-use hardware and software against real battlefield conditions. That is their day job. The list is short, and it is the whole list — there is no platform team behind it.

Technical review

They look at the product itself before we invest: what it does, how it is built, whether it holds up where it is meant to be used.

End-customer validation

Introductions to the people who operate this class of technology in the field, so product decisions are tested in use.

Access that does not end at the check

The same people stay reachable afterwards, for specific problems as they come up.

Questions

Before you write

Do you lead rounds?

No. We write $250K, up to $500K at later stages, alongside a lead.

Do you follow on?

Yes. About 40% of the fund is held in reserve for it. The point of being early is to still be there when the rounds get larger and outside capital arrives.

Do you take a board seat?

No.

Do I need a warm introduction?

No. Cold email is read.

How long does it take?

A week to the first reply. After that it depends on the technical review. We do not sit on decisions.

We build a finished product — a drone. Are you the wrong fund?

Yes. We back what goes into the platform, not the platform itself. The full line is under What we back.

We are not in Ukraine. Should we still write?

A quarter of the fund is open to allied markets, provided the technology is the same class.

What should the first email say?

What the technology is, who uses it, and what stage you are raising at. If there is hardware, something of it working beats a slide describing it.